If I were a big bank, I wouldn’t lend you money either

I hate when politicians try to make “too big to fail” about whiny consumers who couldn’t get a loan to finish a deck that overlooks their backyard.  The concept raised its head again during a Senate sub-committee hearing on J.P. Morgan Chase’s loss of some six or more billion dollars, a loss resulting from some bone-headed position they took on a trade.

What politicians should be saying is that neither a bank, no matter how large, or a consumer, no matter the size of the proposed deck, should get a bailout.  Taking away the punch bowl would result in both banks and consumers practicing more discipline over their own banking practices.

For banks, a major part of that discipline may be reducing the number of connections they have with other banks.  While regulators and commentators have determined that the size of a bank, whether measured by customer base, amount of deposits, or market capitalization lies at the root of the problem with banks, I see the cause of the bank problems having to do with where they invest their funds and who invests with them.  Banks saw their assets take a hit when the value of the securities they held in other financial institutions started to take a hit.  When the bankers of bankers realized that their capital and the expected returns on them might evaporate, they made calls that became less likely to be answered.  If Citibank didn’t own assets backed by loans made by Countrywide or any other institution where consumers could not keep up with payments, we more than likely would be having another conversation.  Were there a regulation prohibiting this type of connectivity, banks may not have found themselves in this type of mess.  Maybe banks should have had their investments and lending restricted to non-financial entities, thus investing in real drivers of the economy instead of just investing in paper junk held by their financial entity cousins.

But therein lies a dilemma.  Should government, even based on an argument of protecting the economy, regulate a bank’s entry into a market relationship with another bank?  I don’t think it should.  What government can do is cut off the spigot.  The government should reintroduce the notion of risk into the market by taking away the punch bowl.  Congress should pass and the President sign into law legislation that terminates the discount window and federal funds overnight loans between banks.

Also, the federal government needs to get out of the deposit insurance business.  Put the onus on the consumer to do its due diligence to identify banks with practices that put the capital “F” into fiduciary.

I would expect the “government as Sky Daddy” advocates will scream and shout that consumers need protection from abusers of the public’s trust, but the best reassurances that a consumer can have is that of information.  If government has any role, it should be that of information clearing house.  Government can do what it really does best which is become a depository of market information accessible by banks and consumers alike.  Consumers with unbiased, low cost market information may be able to make better decisions about where to put their deposits and make their investments.



About Alton Drew

Alton Drew brings a straight forward and insightful brand of political market intelligence. Alton Drew graduated from the Florida State University with a Bachelor of Science in economics and political science (1984); a Master of Public Administration (1993); and a Juris Doctor (1999). You can also follow Alton Drew on Twitter @altondrew.
This entry was posted in banks, capital, Congress, consumer protection, consumers, Economy, Federal Reserve, Financial Regulation, free markets, Political Economy, too big to fail and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to If I were a big bank, I wouldn’t lend you money either

  1. Kenneth Ciszewski says:

    “Also, the federal government needs to get out of the deposit insurance business. Put the onus on the consumer to do its due diligence to identify banks with practices that put the capital “F” into fiduciary.”

    During the 1960s-1980s, there was a financial institution in St. Louis, Missouri named Community Federal Savings and Loan. It made mortgage loans using depositors’ money. It regularly paid 5-5.5% interest, and so it attracted a lot of deposits.

    It came to pass that it made a $20 million loan to some investors in Texas to building some apartments. Texas Governor John Connolly was part of the group of investors who couldn’t make the payments, which put Community Federal Savings and Loan at risk for going broke. Since the deposits were FDIC insured, US federal regulators seized the assets, closed this savings and loan, and sold the assets to a large local bank (Boatmen’s). I had a few thousand dollars, not a lot of money, in Community Federal Savings and Loan. Because of the FDIC action, my money was secured, and the CDs involved were transferred to Boatmen’s Bank.

    If the FDIC had not been there to secure these deposits, I would likely been in the back of a long line of depositors and creditors trying to get their money out of a bankruptcy proceeding. We all know who gets most of the money in a bankruptcy proceeding–the executives who have to be retained (so they claim–just look at the recent Hostess bakery mess) to sell the assets, and the lawyers involved.

    Now, just say that there was no FDIC, and the depositors were suddenly notified that Community Federal was about to go out of business. What would likely happen? Possibly a 1929 style bank run on Community Federal. There might be a run on other financial institutions as well, as panic spread (other savings and loans weren’t doing that well at that time either).

    There have been a large number of bank failures during the Great Recession. A lot of ordinary people who still save money in banks could have been badly harmed without FDIC intervention.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s