What #conservatives really mean by less #government

When a conservative says, “we need less government”, what they are really saying is we don’t need policies that interfere with protecting returns on capital.  At least that is the view a classic liberal or even a libertarian would take.

Today’s conservative, while hiding behind the veil of classical liberalism, is really as much pro-government as his progressive opposites.  Conservatives, while finding abhorrent the idea of excessive government spending, show a proclivity for excessive regulation of social behavior which to me is a lot worse than taxation.  Gay marriage is a no-no, and abortions should be regulated out of existence.

Conservatives readily support military forays into the Middle East and will chastise opponents who think that military expenditures to fund these adventures are too costly.  Just look at Senator John McCain’s criticism of President Barack Obama’s delay in intervening in Syria.   These misadventures result in the loss of American life with nary a connection to how the loss benefits us here at home, but when it comes to government’s role in maintaining a healthy society, conservatives are quick to challenge the costs of food program initiatives even when tied to a decades long policy of helping to consume agricultural surpluses.

No, the conservative mantra of limited government is a false one.  Substituting gotcha moments from a house oversight committee meeting a la Darrell Issa for real substantive legislation that eliminates unnecessary, unconstitutional agencies is not the same as pursuing smaller or limited government.

How many of us can name a congressman who is sponsoring a bill that eliminates any agency?  For all the talk conservatives provided about eliminating federal agencies during the 2012 general election primaries,  I have not seen any initiatives on course to achieve that.

And why won’t we see it?  Because conservatives have a dual mandate when it comes to government’s role.  Government should not interfere with returns on capital, and should be used to bring about a better society by regulating individual social behavior.

Instead, conservatives should be focusing on a government that distributes in an optimal manner our nation’s natural resources, ensuring that those resources go to private entities ready to put them to good use as indicated by the premium they are willing to pay for access.

Conservatives should also focus on maintaining an efficient justice system that addresses issues and controversies of fraud, theft, property rights, and violation of person.

In addition, conservatives should focus on ensuring a health care delivery system designed primarily to address the spread of contagion and a national defense system minus the John McCain zeal for military misadventures abroad.

It’s not about less government, but government focused on preserving our liberties.

About Alton Drew

Alton Drew brings a straight forward and insightful brand of political market intelligence. Alton Drew graduated from the Florida State University with a Bachelor of Science in economics and political science (1984); a Master of Public Administration (1993); and a Juris Doctor (1999). You can also follow Alton Drew on Twitter @altondrew.
This entry was posted in capital, commerce, Economy, free markets, government, health care, healthcare, Political Economy, regulation, spectrum and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to What #conservatives really mean by less #government

  1. Ken Ciszewski says:

    I have to say, Alton, you expressed something that I have been thinking about for a long time in a clear, accurate, and precise manner. The problem is, as I see it, that conservatives tend to be religious conservatives who think that everyone should be subject to whatever morality their religion espouses. It makes not difference whether they are Christian, Islamic, or Mormon–it’s their way or the highway, because God said so. They must show sinners the “RIGHT WAY” (in caps, italicized, in quotes, in 72 point type). (Thank God we are not under Sharia law!!!)

    The other thing is that when they talk about smaller government, or cutting government “waste”, it really about cutting programs they don’t like. Ronald Reagan was an example of this–I remember the speech he gave about it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s