Roseanne Barr, Valerie Jarrett, the Deplorables, and Safety Pins

Roseanne Barr made some unflattering remarks about Valerie Jarrett, a former aide to former President Barack Obama. The actress, best known for the ABC production, Roseanne, tweeted that Ms Jarrett was the spawn of an Egyptian political group, the Muslim Brotherhood, and “the planet of the apes.”  ABC’s response was swift, a cancellation of the reboot of the popular 1990s situation comedy. Ms Barr went the apology route but it was a path taken too late as far as ABC was concerned.

Social media and traditional media have been on fire all day as some people expressed how they were offended by the remarks while others came to Ms Barr’s defense. The posturing was to be expected. What I also expected was that no one in the press has so far addressed three political questions. One, what is racism? Two, must blacks always have liberal whites come to their rescue with safety pins? Three, how will rural deplorables react?

The definition of racism has gone through a simpleton devolution over the past four decades. Once upon a time, racism referred to a systemic and systematic application of rules and conduct designed to deprive a class of people of social, economic, and political standing based on a narrative that their race was inferior to the race of the ruling class. While name calling and insults are expected to swirl around the social and institutional constructs that put discriminatory rules in place, name calling and insults alone did not necessarily translate into racism. Not only do you need hate, you also need emotional, legal, and physical power to deploy an infrastructure that relegates people to a second or third-class position. You need the power of the state, a state action to implement a racist infrastructure. I would argue that Ms Barr’s actions never arose to racism and no state action was present.

To be Muslim is to be an adherent of Islam, a religion, not a race. As for the phrase, “planet of the apes”, blacks in America have been referred to as monkeys for centuries. Neither Ms Jarrett, myself, or the almost one billion people who refer to themselves as black consider ourselves monkeys; therefore, the insult remains with Ms Barr. So why would the name calling arise above just that, name calling? It arises in part because liberal whites need to push the “safety pin” issue.

In the U.S., liberal whites started a safety pin campaign in 2016 where the pin symbolized a safe place for people afraid of President-elect Donald Trump. Mr Trump has come to represent for some Americans a resurgence of American racism and intolerance. Today’s reaction on social media by liberal whites indicates that they are willing and ready to incorporate Ms Barr’s comments in their overall campaign to paint the current economic and political climate as so toxic that nothing less than extinguishing Republican control of Congress, state legislatures, and governorships will be accepted.

Ms Barr’s support of Mr Trump probably didn’t help her cause with her critics or ABC.  I am not a fan of Ms Barr or either itineration of her show but based on television ratings for the Roseanne reboot cited in published reports, Ms Barr seems to have made a connection with low-income conservative middle America. And that leads to my third question, how will the “Trump Deplorables” react?

Scott D. Pierce argues that one cannot say definitively that Ms Barr’s TV character is truly conservative but Ms Barr is another story. How well do low-income white conservative viewers relate to the show, I do not know. There is the potential for Ms Barr to really go rogue and use her celebrity and social media platform to spread her arguably radical conservative narrative.

ABC may have let the genie loose.

3 thoughts on “Roseanne Barr, Valerie Jarrett, the Deplorables, and Safety Pins

  1. ABC’s swift reaction to these comments probably reflects the network’s fear of “reprisal” by boycott organized and spread by social media. We saw this before during the gay marriage/LGBT conflict a few years ago when some corporations threatened to stop doing business in states that passed laws that openly discriminated against LGBT people, in fear of public outrage and boycotts. Look what happened to Rush Limbaugh when he called that young woman who testified in favor of birth control health care benefits–advertisers fled in fear of being boycotted.

  2. I think liberals are concerned that the present administration will indeed apply its power and authority in racist ways, or at least tacitly encourage racist actions against blacks and other minorities that may lead to de facto discrimination.

  3. My personal thought on all of this is that the name calling and defaming of people needs to stop. The kind of name calling and defamation we have experienced by Trump is not worthy a President of the United States. I have a 7 year old grandson who has more respect for other people than Trump does. If Trump has a policy position he wishes to extol, that’s what he should do, and explain why that policy is the one we should follow. At that point we can have debate on the merits of the various policy positions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.